Something I Missed


I don’t read Outside magazine and neither, apparently, does the Weekly Standard crew. So, we both missed this:

THE SCRAPBOOK is not very big on the outdoors, but we do sometimes take vicarious pleasure in reading Outside magazine. We were more than a little astonished to come across an article headlined “The Case for Drilling ANWR” in the eco-glossy’s February issue.

Author David Masiel, who worked on barges before turning to writing, interviewed Washington wonks and Alaskan oil crews, as well as environmentalists and indigent tribesmen. What he’s produced is a model of one-man investigative journalism. He argues that carefully targeted oil drilling in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge can be done safely. The Bush administration has made this argument in the name of energy independence; more important to Masiel is the economic benefit that would flow to the Inupiat villages of Kaktovik, on Alaska’s northern shore.

With special issues devoted to the nation’s water supply and in-depth coverage of tropical rainforests, no one’s about to accuse the crunchy-cute Outside magazine of being a patsy for Bush.

Which makes it all the more courageous of them to publish this piece.

About the author

Erick Erickson

1 comment

  • It was a good piece and although I don’t agree with the conclusion it’s a view that is legitimate. What isn’t is the idea that ANWR drilling is the cure all for everything energy related. Nothing could be further from the truth, but the natives and the Republicans want the money. That’s the bottom line. As a biologist, I can’t let that happen. ANWR is bigger than money.

By Erick Erickson

Erick Erickson

Get in touch

You can check me out across the series of tubes known as the internet.