Reed v. Cagle


Someone opposed to Reed has to be feeding the AJC the stories and Occam’s Razor suggests we go with Cagle’s camp . . .

Okay, so back to the Reed event rumor. I know both of the guys who were put on as hosts and who allegedly did not want to be hosts. I have tried contacting them to see, but haven’t heard back yet. I’m leaving that as a rumor.

Knowing one of the chairs of the event rather well, I’m pretty sure that, were something like this to happen, it would have been more a communication problem than a “they put on a host who did not want to be there” problem.

Let’s back up to what we know thus far about this race:

The AJC is beating the hell out of Reed over gambling.

Reed denies the charges and most of those around him also deny the charges — though by reading the AJC you’d think only Reed was denying the charge.

Several of the folks tied to Cagle really don’t like Reed. They have, how shall we say it, a vested interest in making sure Reed does not get elected — more so than they have making sure Cagle does get elected, though that would be a side benefit.

But, here is where it gets interesting:

Right now very few people are paying attention except the contributors. I’m hearing that some contributors were getting antsy, but that the Reed campaign has, in the past couple of weeks, done a phenomenal job of quelling rumors and reassuring contributors. As a result, what looked like a possible dip in contributions over this issue, was nothing more than a blip.

My DC sources who were saying that Reed may be in jeopardy, are now saying that not only are they in it now for Reed, but we should be soon seeing some of Reeds longtime adversaries lining up behind him — if not publicly, then privately where they will either keep their mouths shut or whisper nice things in the ears of those who can help. Some of the big conservative names besides Zell Miller and Sean Hannity will most likely be coming out for Reed before the summer is up. In fact, I got a phone call this morning from a trusted source inside the Beltway who says the word on the street is that Reed “is golden” — a rather hip way of saying that Reed is in good standing with folks you might think he wouldn’t be in good standing with.

In the grassroots circles in Georgia, two questions are circulating: (1) is Reed damaged and (2) will that damage knock him out.

Not surprisingly, the answer to the first is yes. Reed has been damaged — but not in a major way. He has a loyal following among many grassroots activists and his campaign, though flying under the radar, has already built a statewide campaign structure, but an outside observer would never know it.

The answer to the second question is a decidedly firm no. Interestingly, one outside observer told me that what some view as a Reed handicap — issues related to the Georgia flag — will actually help him. Flaggers, who have been targeting this site with anti-Reed comments, are making some in the Georgia GOP nervous. These nervous folks do not want a repeat of the flag issue and the flaggers have already gone around the state with “Punt Perdue” signs, which are not helping them with the Governor. Having the flaggers so antagonistic toward Reed has left some with the impression (though all my sources are adamant that the answer is no) that the flaggers are firmly with Cagle. My sources tell me that the flaggers are not so much with Cagle as they are against Reed. But, with folks realizing letting the flaggers out of the bottle will only set the state GOP back, the more vocal the flaggers are against Reed, that may ironically help him. Getting Reed elected will, some in the know feel, put a firm lid on the flaggers.

Another factor weighing in on the no side is money. Look for Reed to blow Cagle out of the water at the June 30 filing. While the AJC has been firing lots of bullets at Reed — and let’s all be honest, it may be the AJC doing it, but those of us who have been in the business long enough know someone opposed to Reed has to be feeding the AJC the stories and Occam’s Razor suggests we go with Cagle’s camp — no one is really paying attention. By the time people do start paying attention, Reed will be able to hammer through with money.

The conclusion is rather simple. This is still Ralph Reed’s race to lose. There is still a year in which he could lose it. But, there is still lots of money for Reed to tap into and when he starts up his full communications strategy, we probably all want to stand back and watch. Despite what you may think of Reed, give him credit for one thing — he is a master of politics. And if you disagree with me, you are underestimating Ralph Reed. Better break out your Art of War.

Oh, one last humorous point — a good friend at the RNC who has no dog in the fight had a conversation with me yesterday. He said he wouldn’t be surprised if Ralph is behind the AJC stuff. “Huh?!” I remarked. He said that Ralph Reed has lots of folks who revile him as some sort of Christian anti-Christ. Most of these folks have no problem with gambling and have no problem with the lottery. “So, Ralph had something to do with casinos? Big deal,” he says. “That may hurt him with the Republicans in Georgia who vote in primaries, but that’ll only soften his image among those who’ve only though of him as the anti-Christ.”

I don’t know that I’d agree with that, but it is an interesting point to consider.

About the author

Erick Erickson


  • Dignan – I do not think anyone on this board thinks that Reed is lockstep with the Christians. LMAO. If anything, they think he is lockstep with Lucifer!

    Bill – Reed will likely be called as a witness in McCain’s hearings. He has to be careful what he says or he could be charged with perjury.

  • Erick, your comments regarding “Ralph denying the charges” is inaccurate. Ralph hasn’t ponied-up to the phone/e-mail to offer his own, personal denial. He keeps speaking through a spokeswoman. It is always “according to Reed’s spokeswoman” or, “according to Reed’s spokeswoman through e-mail.”

    When Ralph himself denies/explains what he knew and when he knew it, let us know. THAT will be ground-breaking news.

  • I do not want the Democrats back in control, which is why I support Casey Cagle. Reed’s scandals will demoralize our base, frighten independents and jeopardize the reelection of Sonny Perdue. He will be worse than his former client Mitch Skandalakis, whose disastrous campaign for Lieutenant Governor brought down Guy Millner and David Ralston with him.

  • Lee:
    I would gladly see the Democrats back in control than see flaggers having any influence in the state. And this is coming from a staunch conservative who has never voted Democrat.

  • Ralph is not a conservative, moderate or pragmatist. He is a fraud who sells his conservative reputation to the highest bidder.

  • Dingan wants the flaggers to go away? His wish will be granted. We have not been back as delegates to the State Convention since 2001 when Ralph Reed lured us into supporting him for State Chairman. We will not be helping elect Sonny Perdue as Governor in 2006. We will go away, and we will see how you do without us.

  • Ralph holds himself out as one thing, but is the exact opposite. Pragmatism? No. Hypocrisy? Absolutely. Whatever you think of the Flaggers, Ralph is the one who got in bed with them. He should not get points for screwing them over.

    Ralph is smart — at scamming people. It is best honed skill.

  • I don’t think that Ralph is quite as lockstep with conservative Christians as most people would think. Ralph is much more of a pragmatist than he is usually portrayed. Do not ever underestimate Ralph. He is a smart fellow.

    We really do need these flaggers to go away.

  • Dude, chill out. I’m quoting someone else. I certainly don’t agree with the premise of the last guy quoted, but I think I should be able to quote what people are telling me. Deal with it.

  • So by screwing over the Christian Coalition, the Flaggers and others who have made him who he is, Ralph is now more attractive to moderate voters and hence has a better chance of winning? That is a pretty creative — AND DUMB! — theory.

    Ralph would be nothing without his identification as a Christian conservative leader — A BIG NOBODY! Ralph has gotten his millions in consulting fees not because he is a good consultant (see Skandalakis, Mitch), but because he is a VISIBLE CHRISTIAN LEADER. Ralph has completely sold out his “Flock,” and not just on the issues. His greed to get paid for his work on the Alabama Lottery Campaign has left the reputation of the Alabama Christian Coalition and its leaders DESTROYED.

    Whatever you think of the Flaggers, the fact that Ralph made the Devil’s Bargain with their leaders and then screwed them over does not make him “really a moderate.” It makes him a liar and a hypocrite who will do anything, use anybody to get ahead.

Erick Erickson

Get in touch

You can check me out across the series of tubes known as the internet.